Monday, April 1, 2013

Statement of Intent (2011)


I applied for a scholarship in 2011 for which I needed to submit a statement of intent of 250 words or less. It's like asking a caffeine addict to compose a haiku on the spot. Here's what I cam up with - it was 247 words! Oh, and I did receive the scholarship (go me).

For me, counseling is more than just a job, it’s a vocation. American Theologian Frederick Buechner wrote, “The place where God calls you to is the place where your deep gladness and the world’s deep hungers meet.” I have taken that wisdom to heart in discerning my academic and career goals. I am pursuing a master’s degree in counseling with the goal of becoming a Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor (LPCC); I’ll be among the first in California to enter this emerging profession.
My deep gladness is to help people learn and grow so they may become fully who they are. I have the patience, empathy, and analytic skills to excel in the field of mental health counseling. The role of helper is expressed throughout my employment history. Some of my favorite experiences have been as an educator, counselor, and childcare giver. Pursuing a career in counseling will help me develop the specialty skills and expertise to work with combat veterans in the process of reintegrating into civilian life.
The next five to ten years will see unprecedented demand in mental health care, representing one of the world’s deep hungers. The end of major combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Health Care Reform Act of 2010 will contribute to increased demand for qualified personnel to diagnose and treat mental health conditions. LPCCs will begin to replace Psychologists in some mental health settings because they are as capable and more cost effective. Thank you for considering me.

Counseling Implications for Combat Veterans and Their Families


  
The following is an assignment where we prepared and facilitated an educational group for our peers on the topic of cultural competency with Combat Veterans and their Families. My partner for this assignment was an officer in the US Army with actual combat experience. 

 Counseling Implications for Combat Veterans and Their Families

David Johnson,
David Powell
University of San Diego
School of Leadership and Education Sciences
COUN525 Group Dynamics in Counseling
May 5, 2011



San Diego has a long history as a military hub; in fact, military and defense represents the second largest sector of the economy (Advameg, Inc. 2011). According to local Veterans Administration figures, nearly 250,000 military veterans, men and women, live in the San Diego area. Students preparing to enter the counseling profession in San Diego will probably encounter combat veterans and/or veteran family members at some point in their professional practice. Unfortunately, counseling students are rarely instructed to think about military culture in the same was as other ethnic or minority cultures. The facilitators have relevant knowledge based on research and personal experience in working with combat veterans and offer this session not only for informational purposes, but also to provide an opportunity to engage in a multicultural experience.
            “Counseling Combat Veterans” is designed a single-session group. For this reason, it is important that the group facilitators be explicitly clear regarding the group’s purpose (Jacobs, Masson & Harvill, 2009). This group might be categorized as primarily educational in nature with elements of group discussion and experiential activities included to stimulate participant learning. As noted in the attached Program Outline, the facilitators will explicitly state the purpose of the group within the first 5 minutes. The purpose of this group is to inform student counselors about clinical implications for combat veterans (and their families) and provide experiential learning activities for participants to practice skills based on the information they receive. The learning objectives are to review select clinical implications for working with combat veterans, discuss combat veterans as a unique culture within a multicultural context, and provide an opportunity for counseling skills practice.
The target population for the group is masters-level student counselors at the University of San Diego who provide counseling services to combat veterans or are likely to do so in the near future.  This group will be piloted May 5th, 2011 in the Group Dynamics class with students in that class as the initial participants. Participants are selected based on their enrolling in the Group Dynamics class.
The facilitators will operationalize the term “combat veteran” to include current and former members of the United States Armed Forces who served in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. By extension, we will also use the term “veteran families” to refer to the spouses, dependants, and loved ones of combat veterans and those who work or share living space with them. We will reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM TR-IV) where appropriate and employ specific terms and models that will be familiar to the participants so they may easily integrate the information presented. 
Due to the limited amount of time allotted for the group, the facilitation style of the group is highly leader-directed as described by Jacobs et al (2009, p. 22-23). Not to be confused with an authoritarian leadership style (Capuzzi & Gross, 2002), the leader-directed style is selected because the facilitators have identified a need for knowledge transfer in the target population and are sharing their expertise to help meet said need. Also, since military culture tends to be relatively more leader-directed than mainstream culture, the facilitators will take the opportunity to highlight this contrast between the two cultures. Participants will be expected to accommodate the leaders’ style; however, to prevent boredom or resistance, the group facilitators will provide interactive and visually stimulating elements throughout the session. Any remaining participant discomfort can also be considered as an exercise in capacity-building for empathy for combat veterans who, by virtue of their entrance in military service, are constantly asked to accommodate the leadership style of their superiors.
The session content is divided into two major components, the didactic and the triad.
The didactic contains data, introduces concepts, and defines terms that may be unfamiliar to group participants. A PowerPoint slide show and brief video clips are included for enrichment to help stimulate participants’ interest. The group will provide a basic level of understanding for two particular clinical issues that are especially relevant to combat veterans and their families, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and suicide. Each facilitator will take turns detailing a clinical issue in terms of important facts, definitions, diagnostic criteria, and treatment implications for combat veterans. Concluding the discussion of each clinical issue will be a client success story. The client success stories will be important to elevate the tone of the group and avoid the group taking on a tone that is too esoteric or overly serious. The facilitators will take responsibility for the tone by balancing the more serious elements of the group session with experiential exercises, upbeat music, and use of props as outlined in the course text (Jacobs, et al, 2009).
The triad will employ the use of props and role-play for the purpose of providing the participants with a counseling skill-building opportunity. Because real life combat veterans have a tendency to “bottle” emotions, this practice exercise will involve a bottle of soda to represent the current stress level of a mock client who is a combat veteran. Sugary candy will represent any additional stress of seeking help from a civilian counselor. If the mock client experiences any additional stress in the course of the role play, a piece of candy will be dropped into the soda bottle, reacting in an overflow of carbonated fizz. The exercise is designed to produce a negative association between messy fizz overflow and any counseling errors (i.e. ineffective questions, lack of understanding of military culture, anything that increases stress of the mock clients).
Participants will be randomly assigned into triads each consisting of a counselor, client, or observer. The facilitators will provide general verbal instructions as well as specific written instructions to each participant. “Counselors” will be instructed to meet with the client for a very short session, about 6 minutes. Counselors will attempt to determine whether the client meets diagnostic criteria for either PTSD or suicide by asking only open-ended questions. “Clients” will be supplied with a presenting issue (either PTSD or suicide) as well as other complicating issues that are frequently experienced by combat veterans. Clients will be instructed to specifically avoid disclosing certain pertinent information unless specifically asked by the counselors. “Observers” will monitor the time of the exercise by setting a timer and ending the session when the timer goes off. In addition, observers will visually represent the success/failure of the counselor as by adding candy to the soda if they determine the clients have been placed under additional stress.
            Following the exercise, the facilitators will utilize a round to ask the participants to highlight their experiences, describe what they learned, and/or ask any questions they may have. Facilitators will praise participants for making appropriate clinical decisions, discussing their observations, and/or developing their capacity for serving combat veterans.
            The group session will conclude with mention of information and referral resources for participants. Facilitators will thank the attendees for their active participation. A feedback session will be then facilitated by the Group Dynamics instructor.



Program Outline (50 Minutes)

I.               Introductions, etc. (5 minutes)
A.   Presenters identify themselves and share their area of expertise
B.    Purpose of the group
a.     The purpose of this group is to inform student counselors about clinical implications for combat veterans (and their families) and provide experiential learning activities for participants to practice skills based on the information they receive.
b.     The learning objectives are to review select clinical implications for working with combat veterans, discuss combat veterans as a “culture” within a multicultural context, and provide an opportunity for counseling skills practice.
C.    Overview of the session and expectations
a.     Session is divided into two units: Informative presentation and Skills building exercise.
b.     Presentation may include imagery which may be unsuitable for sensitive individuals; such individuals should excuse themselves now if they do not want to participate.
c.     Housekeeping items: Bathrooms, cell phones, emergency exits, who is certified in first aid?, how will questions be handled?, evaluation period after.

II.             Clinical Issues: PTSD and Suicide PowerPoint Presentation with Videos
A.   PTSD – David J (12 Minutes)
a.     PTSD Facts: How many cases? How is PTSD defined? What causes it?
b.     How to recognize PTSD: Symptoms? How might PTSD manifest in combat veterans?
c.     Success story
B.    Suicide – David P (12 Minutes)
a.     Suicide Facts: How many cases? How is suicide defined? What causes it?
b.     How to recognize suicide: Symptoms? How might suicide manifest in combat veterans?
c.     Success story
III.           Transition (1 minute)
IV.           Counseling Skills Practice (15 Minutes)
A.   Role Play: Reconfigure into triads. Instructions will be given.
B.    Clients present their symptoms, counselors assess for risk and apply diagnostic criteria, and observers visually represent the counselor’s degree of success/failure using candy and soda. Timers will be set for 7 minutes.
C.    Observations: what did you learn?
V.             Information and Referral Resources (3 Minutes)
VI.           Conclusions, affirmations, acknowledgements (2 Minutes)


References
Advameg, Inc., "San Diego: Economy." CityData.com. Available from http://www.city-
data.com/us-cities/The-West/San-Diego-Economy.html. Internet; accessed 14 April 2011.
Capuzzi, D. & Gross, D. R. (2002). Introduction to group counseling (3rd ed.). Denver, CO:
Love Publishing Company.
Jacobs, E. E., Masson, R.L. & Harvill, R. L. (2009). Group counseling: Strategies and skills. (6th
ed.) Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs, "VA San Diego Health Care System." United States
Department of Veterans Affairs. Available from http://www.sandiego.va.gov/about/. Internet; accessed 14 April 2011.



 These slips will be distributed randomly to group participants for the role play:



Counselor: You may ask only open-ended questions.
You are a clinical mental health intern who recently graduated from USD with your master’s degree in counseling. Your studies prepared you for working with diverse cultures, and you are confident in your clinical skills. You are a full time counselor working for a family counseling agency under the supervision of a Marriage and Family Therapist. Use whatever real-life knowledge you have about combat, military culture, and veteran service.

Counselor: You may ask only open-ended questions.
You are an intern who recently graduated from USD with your master’s degree in counseling. Your studies prepared you for working with diverse cultures, and you are confident in your clinical skills. You are a full time counselor working for a family counseling agency under the supervision of a Marriage and Family Therapist. Use whatever real-life knowledge you have about combat, military culture, and veteran service.

Counselor: You may ask only open-ended questions.
You are a school counselor who recently graduated from USD with your master’s degree in counseling. Your studies prepared you for working with diverse cultures, and you are confident in your clinical skills. You work at an alternative middle school for kids with behavior problems. One of your “favorite” ADD/ADHD kids has become so increasingly violent this semester, that placement into a more restrictive school is being considered. The school psychologist has recommended you to meet with the child’s parent, a combat veteran, for an informal conference before next week’s IEP meeting. Use whatever real-life knowledge you have about combat, military culture, and veteran service.

Counselor: You may ask only open-ended questions.
You are a school counselor who recently graduated from USD with your master’s degree in counseling. Your studies prepared you for working with diverse cultures, and you are confident in your clinical skills. You work at an alternative middle school for kids with behavior problems. One of your “favorite” ADD/ADHD kids has become so increasingly violent this semester, that placement into a more restrictive school is being considered. The school psychologist has recommended you to meet with the child’s parent, a combat veteran, for an informal conference before next week’s IEP meeting. Use whatever real-life knowledge you have about combat, military culture, and veteran service.



Client: Your primary goal is to make the counselor believe there is nothing seriously wrong with you. However, you also realize that you have persistent suicidal thoughts which is totally freaking you out. Do NOT tell the counselor about your suicidal thoughts unless you are specifically asked to do so.
You returned from Afghanistan 3 years ago to discover you could no longer relate to your spouse and child. You’re separated, but haven’t had the money to go through the whole divorce thing yet. Finding jobs has been easy for you, but you have a hard time putting up with other people’s drama and stupid crap from bosses, so you usually quit before giving them the satisfaction of firing you. Since you have no strong family connections in any particular place, you recently decided to move to a new city to look for a better job. You feel like a failure most of the time except when you’re high.

Client: Your primary goal is to make the counselor believe there is nothing seriously wrong with you. However, you also realize that you have extremely violent dreams that prevent you from ever getting a full 8 hours sleep. Several times a month you experience vivid memories of Iraq when you’re awake, and sometimes it takes a moment to figure out where you are. Do NOT tell the counselor about your drug use unless specifically asked to do so.
You returned from Iraq 3 years ago to discover you could no longer relate to your spouse and child. You’re separated, but haven’t had the money to go through the whole divorce thing yet. Finding jobs has been easy for you, but you have a hard time putting up with other people’s drama and stupid crap from bosses, so you usually quit before giving them the satisfaction of firing you. Since you have no strong family connections in any particular place, you recently decided to move to a new city to look for a better job. You feel like a failure most of the time except when you’re high.

Client: Your primary goal is to make the counselor believe there is nothing seriously wrong with you. However, you also realize that you have persistent suicidal thoughts which is totally freaking you out. Do NOT tell the counselor about your suicidal thoughts unless you are specifically asked to do so.
You returned from Afghanistan 3 years ago to discover you could no longer relate to your spouse and child. You’re separated, but haven’t had the money to go through the whole divorce thing yet. Finding jobs has been easy for you, but you have a hard time putting up with other people’s drama and stupid crap from bosses, so you usually quit before giving them the satisfaction of firing you. Since you have no strong family connections in any particular place, you recently decided to move to a new city to look for a better job. You feel like a failure most of the time except when you’re high.


Client: Your primary goal is to make the counselor believe there is nothing seriously wrong with you. However, you also realize that you have extremely violent dreams that prevent you from ever getting a full 8 hours sleep. Several times a month you experience vivid memories of Iraq when you’re awake, and sometimes it takes a moment to figure out where you are. Do NOT tell the counselor about your drug use unless specifically asked to do so.
You returned from Iraq 3 years ago to discover you could no longer relate to your spouse and child. You’re separated, but haven’t had the money to go through the whole divorce thing yet. Finding jobs has been easy for you, but you have a hard time putting up with other people’s drama and stupid crap from bosses, so you usually quit before giving them the satisfaction of firing you. Since you have no strong family connections in any particular place, you recently decided to move to a new city to look for a better job. You feel like a failure most of the time except when you’re high.


Observer: Your role is to monitor the client’s response to the counselor for any signs of stress. Specifically look for repeated questions or answers, eye contact, body position, etc.
You will hold the soda, representing the client, and the candy, representing the stress of speaking with the counselor. If the client mentions drug use or suicidal thoughts, drop 4 candies in the soda.

Observer: Your role is to monitor the client’s response to the counselor for any signs of stress. Specifically look for repeated questions or answers, eye contact, body position, etc.
You will hold the soda, representing the client, and the candy, representing the stress of speaking with the counselor. At the 5th minute, regardless of how well the counselor and client may be getting along, begin dropping candies into the soda one at a time.
Observer: Your role is to monitor the client’s response to the counselor for any signs of stress. Specifically look for repeated questions or answers, eye contact, body position, etc.
You will hold the soda, representing the client, and the candy, representing the stress of speaking with the counselor. If the client mentions drug use or suicidal thoughts, drop 4 candies in the soda.

Observer: Your role is to monitor the client’s response to the counselor for any signs of stress. Specifically look for repeated questions or answers, eye contact, body position, etc.
You will hold the soda, representing the client, and the candy, representing the stress of speaking with the counselor. At the 5th minute, regardless of how well the counselor and client may be getting along, begin dropping candies into the soda one at a time. 

A Solution-Focused Approach to Group Dynamics in Counseling: Or, Sister Hazel Explains It All For You


In grad school, stars don't often align in such a way that you may research the same topic for separate papers due at roughly the same time. But, in Spring 2011, that happened. So, pragmatist that I am, I seized the opportunity to write two papers on SFBT. Here is the first. I have been trained to use SFBT techniques in every job I've held throughout my 7 year career in mental health, including my current job.

A Solution-Focused Approach to Group Dynamics in Counseling:
Or, Sister Hazel Explains It All For You


David Johnson
University of San Diego
School of Leadership and Education Sciences
COUN 525 Group Dynamics in Counseling
March 2, 2011

The Solution-Focused Approach: What Is It, Exactly?

             Everyone has problems. Some big; some small. If you are lucky, you know the source of your problem and can face it head-on with courage and resolve. Other times, a problem only manifests unexpectedly and may suddenly disappear, rocking your world until it shatters, leaving in its wake only broken dreams and shards of hope. The good news is that, in the history of the counseling profession, scholars and therapists have developed a variety of different ways of helping clients understand their problems. The logic is that once a client identifies the problem, the client and therapist can then begin to work on a corresponding solution together. The bad news is that the hunting down the source of a problem can be a cumbersome exhausting effort for both client and therapist. Perhaps what is needed is a “Change of Mind.”
             The Solution-Focused approach offers an alternative to the problem-sorting process in counseling. A leading European counselor who trains professionals in this particular approach offers one definition: “The Solution-Focused Approach builds upon clients’ resources. It aims to help clients achieve their preferred outcomes by evoking and co-constructing solutions to their problems” (O’Connell, 2001, as cited in O’Connell & Parker, 2003).  The Solution-Focused approach, also called Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT), is distinguished by three main elements: a.) its social constructivist theoretical world view, b). orientation towards solutions in the future/present as opposed to problems in the past, and c.) its reliance upon client’s own internal resources or competencies (Cepeda & Davenport, 2006).
First, it is important to acknowledge that SFBT is not a theory, per se. In other words, the Solution-Focused approach does not provide an account for why people behave in a particular way (Sharf, 2008). Rather, the techniques involved in delivering SFBT as a therapeutic intervention are based on social constructivism (United States Department of Justice, 2011). Second, as the name implies, it focuses on solutions – what O’Connell (2001 as cited in 2003) calls “preferred outcomes” –  instead of problems. Third and finally, clients are regarded as “experts in their own lives” because they alone “have the strengths and resources to change” behavior and thought patterns that lead to problems (Cepeda & Davenport, 2006).
To illustrate the point, I offer the following mental image of the skeleton key, used by the original developers of SFBT in the 1980s, to explain the concept of de-emphasizing problems in favor of solutions. “Like a skeleton key, an intervention only needs to open the way to a solution which can be done without knowing all the details [of the specific problem]” (De Shazer, Berg, Lipchik, Nunnally, Molnar, Gingerich, & Weiner-Davis, 1986). Imagine trying to access a locked door (the client’s problem). What a tiresome complicated process  it would be sorting through an entire ring of door keys of different shapes colors and sizes (different theoretical approaches), using trial and error, until you find the one that fits just right (solution)! Why not simply use a skeleton key (SFBT), designed to open an infinite number of doors without particular regard for any particular lock?

Solution-Focused Brief Therapy Applications to Group Dynamics in Counseling 

            The Solution-Focused approach offers some very interesting applications in group dynamics. In this section, I will refer to specific interventions of the Solution-Focused approach, give a brief description of the intervention, and discuss how the theory might apply in a therapeutic group context. Note there is a separate discussion of pros and cons of the approach elsewhere in this paper.
            Drawing further upon the skeleton key image, a Solution-Focused orientation allows group leaders increased flexibility in determining membership of the group. Just as the skeleton key is compatible with many locks, the Solution-Focused approach may prove beneficial to diverse members struggling with many diverse problems within the same group. For example, one study looked into the efficacy of a “Doing-What-Works Group” made of psychiatric outpatients with several different diagnoses (Quick & Gizzo, 2007).
A primary Solution-Focused intervention is problem-free talk, engaging clients in discussion about aspects of their lives that are going well in an effort to develop rapport and provide a more complete picture of the client’s overall functioning (Lethem, 2002). Members of a Solution-Focused group may instinctually practice problem-free talk in the early sessions, if for no other reason than they are unacquainted with each other’s particular problems. This can be especially comforting for individual clients who may be sensitive about disclosing too much about their particular issues; because problems are of secondary importance, group members who choose to keep their problem/issue private may do so while still fully participating in the group.
            Goal-setting is another core intervention of the Solution-Focused approach. To a large degree, therapeutic progress towards the client’s overall solution is measured by progress toward a series of specific, achievable, subordinate goals (Marek, Sandifer, Beach, & Coward, 1994). Solution-Focused group leaders are advised to strike a balance between supporting and challenging clients to achieve their goals both as individuals and as the group as a whole (Egan, 2009, p. 132). 
            One distinct advantage to therapeutic groups generally, but is particularly true of the Solution-Focused approach is the importance of the wisdom of the group. Groups are efficient, in part, because they utilize the internal resources of several people, not just the client and therapist (Jacobs, Masson, and Harvill, 2009, p 2-3). Quick and Gizzo (2007) found in their “Doing-What-Works” study that the group members cited “the value of feedback, support, ventilation, and hearing multiple perspectives… [and] the “same boat phenomenon” (e.g., ‘I realize I’m not the only one with problems’)”.

Pros and Cons

            The Solution-Focused approach to group dynamics in counseling shows promise in helping clients and groups to achieve their preferred outcomes. It is important to remember that there are limitations to using SFBT for groups.
            Clients may benefit from Solution-Focused group work by being able to fully participate in group processes without necessarily being required to disclose their particular problems with the group. Solution-Focused interventions are easy to learn can be applied to a diverse group of clients who may have very different problems to work on. By engaging with one another in problem-free talk in the group, clients develop rapport with one another and can even take the opportunity to affirm each other on aspects of their lives that are going well. Clients benefit from goal setting on both individual and group levels and are able to hold one another accountable in a supportive yet challenging therapeutic setting. Goal setting also helps clients see progress towards their individual preferred outcomes and help them improve their understanding of their own inner resources and competencies. Finally, the efficiency of working in groups with all their collective wisdom, can help clients to make measurable progress at a faster rate than would be possible in individual counseling.  
            Therapists using the Solution-Focused approach to group work may benefit by being able to assemble a diverse population of clients into one group. Therapists can also relying on group members to support and challenge individual clients in reaching their goals, when a more direct one-on-one approach isn’t optimal for the client. For example, an individual client can connect with other group members and may still benefit from group wisdom even though an interpersonal connection with the group leader may be lacking.
            Most of the criticism of SFBT points to its lack of engagement with client’s problems (McNeilly, 2000. Introduction). It is certainly logical that ignoring a serious problem will likely have negative repeated consequences for the client. Thus, it is important for the Solution-Focused therapists to be able to help client’s acknowledge and understand problems even while helping develop the competencies to deal with problems. SFBT is still a relatively new approach to counseling, and some debate remains about whether it fully deserves to be included with other evidence-based models (United States Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 2011). Because group members may have diverse problems, it is easy to imagine some individuals who might reject the Solution-Focused approach precisely because they expect to work at understanding their particular problem, since many other groups using different theoretical models operate in this way.
            In conclusion, the Solution-Focused approach to group dynamics in counseling offers an innovative alternative for clients with problems who want to feel better. Particularly in circumstances where an exhaustive search for a problem may be unproductive, inefficient, or painful for the client, SFBT will focus on the client’s inner resources and competencies and help the client move towards his or her preferred outcomes. In group settings where a solution-focused approach is desires, members will benefit from the collective wisdom of group members without the requirement to share painful personal details of their problems. I leave you with a few lyrics from the feel-good alternative rock band Sister Hazel and their 2000 hit single “Change Your Mind” which I feel greatly captures the spirit of the Solution-Focused approach:
“If you've had enough/Of all your tryin'/Just give up /The state of mind you're in…
If you want to be somebody else, /If you're tired of fighting battles with yourself
If you want to be somebody else/Change your mind...”

References

Cepeda, L. M., & Davenport, D. S. (2006). Person-centered therapy and solution-focused brief
therapy: An integration of present and future awareness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(1), 1-12. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.1.1
De Shazer, S, Berg, I.S, Lipchik, E, Nunnally, E, Molnar, A, Gingerich, W, & Weiner-Davis, M.
(1986). Brief therapy: focused solution development. Family Process, 25(2), 207 - 234.
Egan, G. (2009). The skilled helper: a problem-management and opportunity-development
approach to helping. Belmont, CA: BrooksCole Pub Co.
Lethem, J. (2002). Brief solution focused therapy. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(4),
189-192. doi:10.1111/1475-3588.00033
Jacobs, E, Masson, R, & Harvill, R. (2008). Group counseling: strategies and skills. Belmont, CA:
BrooksCole Pub Co.
Marek, L. I., Sandifer, D. M., Beach, A., & Coward, R. (1994). Supervision without the problem: A
model of solution-focused supervision. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 5(2), 57-64.
doi:10.1300/j085V05N02_04
McNeilly, R. (2000). Healing the whole person: a solution-focused approach to using
empowering language, emotions, and actions in therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
O’Connell, B. (2001) Soltuion-Focused Stress Counseling. London: Continuum, as cited in
O'Connell, B , & Palmer, S. (2003). Handbook of solution-focused therapy. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
Quick, E. K., & Gizzo, D. P. (2007). The "Doing What Works" Group: A Quantitative and
Qualitative Analysis of Solution-Focused Group Therapy. Journal of Family
Psychotherapy, 18(3), 65-84. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
Sharf, R. (2008). Theories of psychotherapy & counseling: concepts and cases. Belmont, CA:
BrooksCole Pub Co. p. 338.
Sister Hazel. (2000). “Change Your Mind.” On the CD album Fortress. Los Angeles: Universal
Records, A Division of UMG Recordings, Inc. (June 27, 2000).
United States Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
(2011). Office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention model programs guide
Washington, DC: Retrieved from http://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/mpgProgramDetails.aspx?ID=712